Predicting Marriage

A sociology professor at the University of Miami has recently published a study in Social Science Research where he explores the different traits that make someone a marrying type. The Atlantic has an article on the study, providing a broad overview of it. If I get some free time later I will dig into the study, but the overview provided in that Atlantic piece validates certain ideas that I (and others) have advanced. The highlights:

Michael T. French, a sociology professor at the University of Miami, and his team looked at longitudinal data of more than 9,000 adolescents as they became young adults—starting in 1994 when participants were in high school and middle school and ending in 2009 when they were aged 24 to 34. Interviewers were asked to rate the participants’ looks, personality, and grooming on a scale of one to five, five being the most attractive. So this study doesn’t get into the nuances of personality, and how one person’s “sarcastic and abrasive” might be another’s “charming and adorable,” but instead just looks at whether someone’s personality is generally “attractive.”

Of those three traits, the only statistically significant interaction was that men with an above average attractive personality were more likely to get married. Taking each of the factors individually, no other significant trends emerged. But those three factors in aggregate (what the researchers called “the personal traits index”) were linked to likelihood of marriage. Someone who scored more highly on the index overall was more likely to walk down the aisle.

The fact that men with an “above average attractive personality” tended to marry more often would seem to indicate that my LAMPS/PSALM model has some merit to it. Since Power/Personality stands out among other factors (like physical attractiveness), that supports my contention that the P component of male attraction vectors is the most potent of them. Also, since Power/Personality is a huge component of male MMV, and not just SMV, it would/should translate into a greater ability to marry (for men). And that is exactly what seems to be the case here.

There are a few other points worth noting about the study:

  • Its focus on attractiveness fits in well with the overall state of marriage, in that it is largely hedonic in this day and age. Although as I study more on the subject, it looks like that isn’t an entirely new thing. Rather, it is just more prominent now.
  • There doesn’t seem to be as strong of a correlation between an attractive female personality and marriage. Part of me wonders what they meant by “attractive personality” for women. Since personality is a factor in female MMV, does it simply mean agreeable, or something more?
  • I was a bit surprised that grooming was thrown in here, although in retrospect it makes sense. Since it seems to have an effect, in aggregate, it is something that marriage minded men and women shouldn’t ignore.

That does it for now.



Filed under APE, Attraction, LAMPS, Marriage, Men, Red Pill, Women

2 responses to “Predicting Marriage

  1. I saw this study today as well and in looking at it, noted that the personality traits sought out included things like kindness–things which women value in men. Overall, personality definitely matters, but some might be surprised by the specific personality traits that women deem attractive in men.

  2. mdavid

    donal, Although as I study more on the subject, it looks like that isn’t an entirely new thing. Rather, it is just more prominent now.

    Looks always mattered, of course. But the reason looks have increased in value is that resources are more abundant and due to supply and demand issues have thus dropped in relative value. Iow, in the past men and women both were more likely to settle on looks because they had to, if only to eat.

    Today, due to technology, being single is an easy option for nearly everyone in the West. And thus the marriage bar moved higher. Especially for women, who in the past were extremely dependent on male provision and evolved to this reality. Today, it’s like a big resource orgy in the West, and women truly don’t need men to participate in it; educated women get good jobs and poor women have government handouts. Thus, men offering resources have dropped massively in MMV, giving looks more relative impact.

    Of course, the Darwinian response will be lower competition from both the SWPL girls and the poor welfare women, who generally won’t have the stability to compete genetically with traditionals (look at the genetic growth of Mormons and Amish). The only women who will be able to maintain large families in the future will be humble women who pursue men to support a traditional family; these children will eventually dominate the gene pool and be recreate traditional society. But it will be some time to see the genetic results, and change the era we live in. Got many years in the wilderness left…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s