The Shrinking Gap- The Conundrum of Female SMV and Marriage

My latest post, which examined how male attractiveness increasing with age is thwarted by the current nature of the marriage market, prompted a female reader of mine to contact me. She agreed with my assessment of the state of the MMP for men, and then offered her thoughts on how things worked for women. I thought they were excellent points, and she graciously allowed me to integrate them into a post. The first part of this post will be quotes from the two of us, mostly hers, with some of my replies. The second part will be an analysis and summary of the points raised earlier.

I.

My reader, who wishes to remain anonymous, said this:

[As a woman it] may be, or rather, it is simple enough to attract a man in your age bracket that displays good overall LAMPS simply by being young and in shape while dressing and acting in a feminine manner. But that only gets my foot in the door. Once the serious talks begin, then there is a completely different set of things that I have to consider.

I think one of the more common situations I have encountered is a man who, nearing or in his early 30s, is ready to settle down with a woman younger than himself. But similarly to situations Red Pill men encounter with various women, he has already “lived his life,” so to speak. He has had numerous “relationships,” ONS’s and everything in between with various women usually starting from high school moving forward and he may have been heavy into the party/club scene which typically means he was also probably heavy into drugs/alcohol. Add a kid or two to put the icing on the cake. Then finally at some point in his late 20s/early 30s he “grows out of that phase” and wants to settle down and take his life and faith seriously. Now keep in mind, these are men in the age bracket to which I am directed to open my search. This search can continue well into my mid to late 20s where by then, my overall [SMV] and fertility are beginning their decline.

When I remarked that she was one of the few women who seemed as cautious of a man’s history as (aware) men tend to be of a woman’s history, she added this:

It’s common Red Pill knowledge what a fast lifestyle in ones twenties can do to woman, ranging from poor overall health, an inability to bond to one man, an overall jaded worldview and the list goes on. But I view it as more of a general thing: one’s past, man or woman, effects your future for better or worse. And speaking from a strictly Christian perspective, I’d be mistaken to attempt to hitch my wagon to a man that had his share of pump and dumps before deciding to settle down in the same way a man would avoid a woman with the same history. A lot can be said for forgiveness and repentance, but a man’s past still counts. At least for me, anyway. That goes equally for sinful misconduct outside the sexual arena, as well. These things can often times be clear markers of different character or personality flaws that may show up further down the road and should I be married to such a man and these patterns or behaviors rear their ugly heads… what can I do?

I responded with these observations:

You make a great point that there are really two different searches someone is conducting. The first is to search for someone who wants to marry, and the second is to search among those who want to marry for someone worth marrying.
I suspect that the reason why the kind of men you describe are common is because those men who never engaged in the party or hook-up have “checked out.” They eschew dating in general, most likely because they were burned one too many times by women.

It seems to be a general conundrum that both men and women face: those who are willing to marry are not worthy, and those who are worthy don’t want to marry.

Those were the most relevant parts of our conversation. This brings us to part 2.

II.

In my previous post, I explained the dilemma that men faced:

The older we get, the more attractive we become to women, but at the same time, there are less marriageable women available to us.

Women face a different situation, one that on its face seems quite a bit worse: Their SMV decreases over time, and there aren’t necessarily any more marriageable men available to them over time.

Women have the advantage of starting off in a better position than men, and that is a considerable advantage, to be sure. But in the current MMP it isn’t so much of an advantage as it could/should be. Younger women who want to marry young find that men their age don’t tend to want to marry. At least, that is what I have heard from my younger female readers, including the one who inspired this post. In this sense, younger men and women are alike; both eschew marriage for the time being. This is unfortunate for young women looking to marry, because younger men tend to have less baggage (just as younger women tend to have less baggage). Those younger men who do want to marry tend to be less attractive, and often are poor choices in other ways as well.

Once you start to look at the older cohort of men you find that they are more attractive, and more eager to marry. On the flip side, they oftentimes have a lot of baggage from their wild and crazy years. While most men don’t build up the same amount of baggage that women do on the carousel, it can and will affect them nonetheless. Most of the men who don’t have baggage fall into two camps: those who chose not to accumulate baggage, and those who couldnt accumulate baggage. The first group is a small percentage of the population, and hard to find (at least, that is what I’ve heard from my female readers). The second group are often poor choices for marriage, because their lack of baggage is largely a result of deficiencies on their part. Also, many of them might not be interested in marriage to begin with, and the absence of baggage arose from the fact that they have left the field and no longer play the game (think MGTOW).

So all in all, for a woman looking for a good man without baggage to be her husband, the pickings look slim indeed. Much the same as it is for men. To repeat myself, those who are willing to marry are usually not worthy, and those who are worthy usually don’t want to marry. And this seems to be the case for men and women.

Thus we get the conundrum that marriage minded women face in the present age: They start out near the peak of their attractiveness, but are in a race against the clock to find marriageable men before their attractiveness fades so much they no longer interest those men.

 

Update: In case it wasn’t clear enough in the main post, this post is written from the perspective of some of my female readers. I don’t necessarily think that all of the observations are correct, but I assumed them to be true for the sake of argument in this post. It was either that, or call them liars. Despite that, I think the ultimate conclusion is still accurate.

175 Comments

Filed under Attraction, Christianity, Courtship, Marriage, Men, Red Pill, Sexual Market Place, Women

175 responses to “The Shrinking Gap- The Conundrum of Female SMV and Marriage

  1. deti's avatar deti

    Sigyn:

    The more you address me, the more you compel me to respond.

    You saying at your blog that you have “compassion fatigue” for men talking about what they don’t like in the SMP is pretty much the same as my interpretation of it, which is you saying you’re sick and tired of reading about men talking about wht they don’t like in the SMP.

    Please, just admit that you really can’t handle men talking about what they don’t like in the SMP/M

  2. In terms of marrying an older man, fear of being a young widow, by which
    I mean around age 60, is a real fear, not so much for economic reasons, but more because she fears loneliness. It wouldn’t be easy for a 60-year-old woman to find a new husband, even if she wanted to.

    In terms of dating, it isn’t so much of a status issue as it is one of compatibility. When I was 20, I dated a 30-year-old acountant for about six months. He was a great guy, but I just got bored. I wanted to go out, he wanted to stay in; our differing lifestages made us incompatible.

    Of course, some couples like NSR and Alla make it work, but I’m not sure this will ever be common.

  3. You saying at your blog that you have “compassion fatigue” for men talking about what they don’t like in the SMP is pretty much the same as my interpretation of it, which is you saying you’re sick and tired of reading about men talking about wht they don’t like in the SMP.

    Nothing of the sort. “Compassion fatigue” is an unfortunate situation that comes of listening to certain types of complaining, regardless of their subject.

    Come over, read it again, and we’ll talk about it there.

  4. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ Sigyn

    I’m curious. What exactly do you find “dismissed” here of the single Christian women’s concerns?

    Yes, everyone knows that everyone aside from male 9s and 10s has it rough in the new SMP/MMP.

    ——————————

    Here are some facts that I’ve present, and actually let me expand on these some more to find a workable model that will work for most Christians.

    If young woman want to marry and they are passed over by the [attractive] similar aged cohorts, and are not attracted to the [unattractive] similar aged cohorts then why not look at older aged men who are just coming into their own?

    I saw a huge pushback from the female commenters here — both married and unmarried — about how they are unwilling to consider those within a larger age gap in years for whatever petty excuses are listed up above.

    If that’s your best shot unless you can somehow pull your SMV up 1-3 points from average to the 6-8+ range with good exercise, nutrition, make up, feminine dress, etc. then are you going to let your SMV keep on depreciating until no one wants you?

    Remember, Christian women are MORE picky than their non-religious counterparts. They want a RELIGIOUS alpha. A alpha man who not only bucks the trend of most alphas and is willing to commit, but to not use his power to cheat on her or otherwise make her life miserable.

    That’s something that’s going to be very difficult to find, because feminism has emasculated the men in the Church. Most churches singles groups are compromised of 60%+ single females or worse sex ratios.

    Let me be clear. There are not enough of these religious alpha men to ever go around, neither will there ever be until Jesus comes again in which case there will be no marriage.

    The logical conclusion:

    SD is actually a very good example of what will work best, for the most Christian women in the MMP with her marriage to her “gamma.” She quells her rebellion through constant study of Scripture, prayer, etc. and finds gratitude in all that he does for her.

    Most Christian women will need find someone that they are moderately attracted to, and then build him up through submission and gratitude to have him become her alpha.

    If a lot of Christian women want to attempt to hold out for their alpha, there are going to be a lot of disappointed single Christian women (with cats).

    Men will have to do something similar, although men tend to be more realistic about their chances with “women out of their league.” Men should realize that when he has sex with this wife (in marriage) he will bond to her and he will have wife goggles. It would help exceptionally if his wife makes every effort to improve her physical appearance for him, in order for him to be attracted to her.

  5. deti's avatar deti

    SSM:

    Perhaps the age difference and fear of young widowhood is present, but I suspect that’s decidedly secondary to the attraction issues. A 20 year old marriage-minded woman is going to be all over a 30 year old attractive man who’s offering commitment; and I bet she’d be willing to overlook the potential for young widowhood – if he’s hawt enough.

    “In terms of dating, it isn’t so much of a status issue as it is one of compatibility.”

    Hmmmm. Maybe, but if they’re compatible, is the age difference going to be all that important?

    I can’t be arsed to ratchet up a lot of sympathy here. IME, women can get pretty much what they want when they want it. If a 28 year old Christian woman isn’t married, it’s because she doesn’t want to be married bad enough.

    [Ed: Incorrect Deti. She could be unmarried because her refusal to sin leads many men to “next” her once they realize her commitment to Chastity.]

  6. deti's avatar deti

    Sigyn:

    Here’s my last word on this.

    The bottom line from your blog post which I referenced today is this: You don’t want to read or hear about what men don’t like about dating, mating, and marriage. You’re sick of men talking about it and you want them to shut up about it.

    The end. Period. Full stop.

  7. deti's avatar deti

    “ When I was 20, I dated a 30-year-old acountant for about six months. He was a great guy, but I just got bored. I wanted to go out, he wanted to stay in; our differing lifestages made us incompatible.”

    Less about your ages than it was about your lifestyles. You: 20 year old party hearty. Him: Accountant (I didn’t need to read further). “He was a great guy but I just got bored” roughly translates to “He’s a nice guy who I wasn’t attracted to.”

  8. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    The scenarios above are unlikely to happen, and there will be a huge abundance of single Christian men and women in the next 10-20 years.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if it continues to get worse with the feminization of men and “empowerment” of women in the church.

    One thing I’ve been wondering. WIth assortive mating when say 3s marry each other and 4s marry each other — do they find each other attractive? They must right? Otherwise they wouldn’t get married aside from the very few convenience marriages there are.

    So attraction must at least somewhat be relative to mindset in both males and females. I think moreso for females than males.

  9. deti's avatar deti

    “One thing I’ve been wondering. WIth assortive mating when say 3s marry each other and 4s marry each other — do they find each other attractive? They must right? Otherwise they wouldn’t get married aside from the very few convenience marriages there are.”

    Deep Strength: My opinion is that in marriages like this with unattractive people marrying each other, under true assortative mating, was that he finds her minimally attractive and she finds him useful. He gets sex and kids and a housekeeper; she gets his time, and his meager resources. Each were very glad to have each other because they each knew where they fit into the SMP and that they were fortunate to have each other.

    Currently these marriages don’t tend to last (or even form) because we have hedonic marriage. He’s not going to invest in an unattractive woman. She’s not going to tie herself down to an unattractive man with little power, low status and little resources. It’s not worth it for either to marry, all things considered.

  10. Maybe, but if they’re compatible, is the age difference going to be all that important?

    No, I don’t think the age gap would be a huge problem if they were compatible and had their lifestages in sync. The problem is, many/most people with a big age gap won’t be in sync, therefore they won’t be compatible.

    I have no problem with there being an age gap; looking for an older man could be a logical thing for a girl to do, but I think it might not be easy to find a compatible older man, that’s all. But I wouldn’t have any problem with my daughters marrying older men if they wanted to.

  11. deti's avatar deti

    Arrrgh.

    Should be “He’s not going to invest in an unattractive WOMAN”

    [Ed: Fixed]

  12. DS, in your first comment to this thread, you implied that the young women reporting this phenomenon were reporting something that was “not true”, and then turned it around and put the blame back on them by saying they needed to adjust their attraction vectors down (without actually knowing where that threshold of attraction lay). You may not have meant it harshly, but you did dismiss it as a valid concern.

    Others said it more directly, for instance calling this complaint a “red herring” and proceeding to the standard talking points about how women have it so good, no sympathy for women, etc. And, inevitably, the conversation turned to the hardships of men in the MMP and marriage itself.

    How should one regard this kind of thing except to conclude that those concerns are being dismissed? I say this without anger or accusation.

  13. The bottom line from your blog post which I referenced today is this: You don’t want to read or hear about what men don’t like about dating, mating, and marriage. You’re sick of men talking about it and you want them to shut up about it.

    I’m sorry that’s what you read into it.

    The end. Period. Full stop.

    Well, you can’t explain yourself to someone unwilling to listen. Oh well, moving right along.

  14. Less about your ages than it was about your lifestyles. You: 20 year old party hearty. Him: Accountant (I didn’t need to read further). “He was a great guy but I just got bored” roughly translates to “He’s a nice guy who I wasn’t attracted to.”

    Well, my point is that in general people with a big age gap will have very different lifestyles.

    I was attracted to Mr. Accountant at first, but he was such a liberal herb that it killed the tingles. He broke up with me when he found out that I had started dating a guy my own age who was a lit major and who cheated on me with both of my best friends before finally moving overseas.. Can I pick ’em or what? lol

  15. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ Deti

    Thanks for the analysis. Probably true.

    @ SSM

    Compatibility is a concept that women are fond of that means jack squat. It doesn’t matter if they’re at “different life stages.” It is a failure of women to recognize that they are different than men, because God created them that way.

    The a young woman/wife is providing something that is valuable to the man namely her beauty, her youth, her fertility, and hopefully love of children, ability to cook and whatever other attributes a man finds useful. Men don’t expect a woman that is on a similar intellectual level or maturity than them. We love teaching women who are eager and willing to please.

    As you yourself have said — women are generally “inferior” to men (although I won’t use that term myself). A man is not looking for his equal, and an age difference only accentuates this “inequality.” You say you realize this, but it shows that you fully do not understand it.

    Likewise, an attractive man provides valuable resources both in time, money, investment, and commitment to the woman to provide for her and her offspring, as well as he can teach her valuable life lessons.

    Marriage is a union of two entities — a man and a woman — that bring different but useful things to the marriage. It is greater than the sum of its parts because of the value created from the interaction both in the bedroom, the relationship, and child rearing.

    [Ed: Good comment. Speaking of Red Herrings, I think “compatibility” is one of them. It goes along just perfectly with the whole “find yourself” mentality which is poisoning young people’s minds these days.]

  16. And third comment in a row:

    DS writes: SD is actually a very good example of what will work best, for the most Christian women in the MMP with her marriage to her “gamma.” She quells her rebellion through constant study of Scripture, prayer, etc. and finds gratitude in all that he does for her.

    Most Christian women will need find someone that they are moderately attracted to, and then build him up through submission and gratitude to have him become her alpha.

    If a lot of Christian women want to attempt to hold out for their alpha, there are going to be a lot of disappointed single Christian women (with cats).

    Men will have to do something similar, although men tend to be more realistic about their chances with “women out of their league.” Men should realize that when he has sex with this wife (in marriage) he will bond to her and he will have wife goggles. It would help exceptionally if his wife makes every effort to improve her physical appearance for him, in order for him to be attracted to her.

    This is very good and very true.

  17. I haven’t had the time to read all the comments. Much less to respond to them. I won’t for quite a while. But I wanted to re-iterate that I expect any debate here to be civil. I won’t hesitate to delete comments when I come back if I’ve found them over-the-line.

  18. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ Sigyn

    DS, in your first comment to this thread, you implied that the young women reporting this phenomenon were reporting something that was “not true”, and then turned it around and put the blame back on them by saying they needed to adjust their attraction vectors down (without actually knowing where that threshold of attraction lay). You may not have meant it harshly, but you did dismiss it as a valid concern.

    It isn’t true. Namely,

    1. Men in greater numbers are willing to marry in similar age cohorts. This is a fact.

    2. It’s also a fact that women report that [attractive] men in their similar age cohort are not willing to marry. Hence, “no men want to marry.”

    This is the common manosphere qualification that when women are talking about men they mean [attractive] men. Both of the above statements are true.

    Please quote from my first post where I put blame on any woman. I’ll even link it for you:

    The Shrinking Gap- The Conundrum of Female SMV and Marriage

    Others said it more directly, for instance calling this complaint a “red herring” and proceeding to the standard talking points about how women have it so good, no sympathy for women, etc. And, inevitably, the conversation turned to the hardships of men in the MMP and marriage itself.

    How should one regard this kind of thing except to conclude that those concerns are being dismissed? I say this without anger or accusation.

    That was not me. I have always stated as I said in one of my comments above that the SMP/MMP is garbage for anyone who is not a male 9 or 10.

    My main qualm as I said in the previous comment has been on the pushback of all of the women in here about marrying with a large age gap. I gave several points on why that is indeed seeing the frame in an incorrect matter yet only a few women have agreed with big qualifications. Ah, the irony.

    And perhaps the question should be — like with the single men of the sphere — how can I make myself more attractive so as to attract an [attractive] man.

  19. @DS

    No, I understand what you are saying and agree with you. I don’t think you caught that I was talking about two different scenarios. For marriage, she worries about being a young widow. For dating, she may find that they aren’t interested in the same things because they are so far apart in age. But again, I think having an age gap is fine if the couple can make it work.

  20. It isn’t true.

    But it may be true FOR THEM–as in, their own experience. Citing statistics and “common manosphere qualifications” does not prove that there are suitable-husband-material (I’m not talking about attractiveness, but Christian qualities) men in any individual woman’s vicinity, or even that those men TEND to want to marry (Donal’s words).

    Please quote from my first post where I put blame on any woman.

    “Blame” was a bit harsh of a word. Let’s say…oh…”assign causation of difficulties”. You did, and continue to, insist that the reason why is because the young ladies have standards too high and should adjust them downward. This puts the “fault” on the women–again, I repeat, not knowing where their standards even are right now.

    That was not me.

    As I made clear by saying “others”. *smile*

  21. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ Sigyn

    But it may be true FOR THEM–as in, their own experience. Citing statistics and “common manosphere qualifications” does not prove that there are suitable-husband-material (I’m not talking about attractiveness, but Christian qualities) men in any individual woman’s vicinity, or even that those men TEND to want to marry (Donal’s words).

    Yes and no.

    As you may know by now, men state things in generalities. Even if there are women here and there where this is not the case, the vast majority of the cases as shown by the statistics show this is not true.

    “Blame” was a bit harsh of a word. Let’s say…oh…”assign causation of difficulties”. You did, and continue to, insist that the reason why is because the young ladies have standards too high and should adjust them downward. This puts the “fault” on the women–again, I repeat, not knowing where their standards even are right now.

    If you’re talking about my comments on righteous alphas that is certainly a fact. Women believe they are entitled something that they were never promised in the Scriptures.

    As I stated earlier, men quote in generalities. Market inefficiencies show themselves at the edges. Time and time again, they show themselves that all women — not just Christian women — in today’s culture have standards too high because of feminism, the entitlement culture, etc.

    If you want to say that’s assigning blame then there’s blame for everyone. Most men have standards too high too.

    So what? We all need more praus — humility / meekness / gentleness.

    Statement of fact is not assigning blame, unless you “feel” offended by it for some reason or another. If I say “wow, we are all sinners and need Christ” that’s certainly true and you could view it if you were an athiest as assigning blame to everyone that should not be there.

    The fact is that self esteem and standards are illusions. We rely on God everyday for every single breath. We rely on Him for our salvation, for His grace and mercy.

    Instead of thinking about my comments in that I’m assigning blame, when you look at things from an eternal perspective it should be clear that the things I mention should show both women and men the error of our ways. That we expect that we are somehow owed something by God. Donal had a recent blog post on this.

  22. @ an observer

    No, I don’t have any fear-based pathologies or daddy issues. I was only contemplating age gaps and marriage as it relates to the past couple of posts and comments on here. I don’t even have a dog in this fight — I’m already married and I only have sons. I was just musing about it a bit because I enjoy reading blogs and thinking/discussing about these things. What I mentioned in my posts were the potential troubles I thought of that might arise in a large age gap marriage. That is all. I meant nothing more than a thought exercise. You are absolutely entitled to disagree and form your own opinion apart from my reservations.

    Secondly, I don’t feel there has been a large “pushback” from women on here regarding this issue. The women have all said in comments that they see nothing wrong or immoral with age gaps; there has only been a little discussion about potential problems, and I don’t see why such a discussion is invalid, if it’s just differing opinions.

  23. theshadowedknight's avatar theshadowedknight

    Sigyn still does not understand, and is unwilling or unable to make the changes that will be needed. She does not get it. It is too far a gap for her to bridge. All that she says must be understood in that light.

    Regarding the doubts of the validity of the disadvantages for women, I offer just about every disagreement ever as proof. Women and their perspectives are generally inapplicable to an objective hypothesis. How many times have men had to explain basic concepts over and over and over again? Do you expect us to take your anecdotes seriously when you are nigh on unable to comprehend the most basic datum?

    Regarding sympathy or the lack thereof for the problems of women, I will start feeling bad when I see some of these women start talking to some of the men. They have options here, but I am not seeing any takers. I do not care if they are having trouble, because it is self inflicted.

    Regarding the specter of “compassion fatigue,” let us not forget to take into account the fact that women have been complaining to men about one thing or another for over a century, and have been told men to be silent when they raised any concerns. Maybe, just maybe, men are sick of the bitching and nagging and wailing? Not to mention that with the tendency of women to turn any discussion around to themselves, we might be less than receptive to more whining? Especially when one of the first things that happens is that we get told to shut it, yet again?

    You have been here for how long and you are already suffering from “compassion fatigue” towards the problems of men? My entire life I have heard about how hard women have it. So it went for the generation before me, and the one before that. Enough, I get it; men are bastards, callous and cruel, and you are suffering, always suffering. Always suffering. Always. Suffering. Always. Always.

    Until men started to pull away, and you lot rushed in and asked, “Where have all the good men gone?” Women will always complain, then make it about themselves, then take over, then it all starts again. Some men are not willing to continue the cycle, and are not inclined to put up with more of the same. No matter what we do, the complaining never ceases, so we do what we want. A no win scenario means that every choice is acceptable and equal.

    You created your monsters, and as punishment, I leave them to you to slay.

    The Shadowed Knight

  24. theshadowedknight's avatar theshadowedknight

    No, seriously. Always. Suffering. Always. Always…

    The Shadowed Knight

  25. As you may know by now, men state things in generalities. Even if there are women here and there where this is not the case, the vast majority of the cases as shown by the statistics show this is not true.

    But:

    Time and time again, they show themselves that all women — not just Christian women — in today’s culture have standards too high because of feminism, the entitlement culture, etc.

    I am familiar with “generalities”. However, generalities admit of exceptions. “All”, on the other hand, does not; “all” is an affirmative statement with no exceptions permitted. By using “the vast majority” to catapult yourself into “all”, which is itself a logical error, you reject the experiences of those excluded from said “vast majority” as non-existent. Thus, you are dismissive, and I am not incorrect in characterizing your responses as such.

    Cheerio.

  26. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    I admit my mistake in using “all” and replace it with “the majority.”

    And yes, you are mischaracterizing most of my reponses from one sentence.

  27. Cassie's avatar femininebutnotfeminist

    @ deti,

    “Women can get pretty much what they want, when they want it.”

    If this were true, there wouldn’t be so many single marriage minded women in their late 20’s and beyond now would there?

    “If a 28 year old christian woman isn’t married, it’s because she doesn’t want to be married bad enough.”

    As a 28 year old single christian woman who DESPERATELY wants to be married (always have), I’m telling you, this statement of yours is pure RUBBISH. There are other forces at work here besides our desire (or your assumed lack thereof). You just don’t care to hear them.

  28. Sigyn still does not understand, and is unwilling or unable to make the changes that will be needed. She does not get it. It is too far a gap for her to bridge. All that she says must be understood in that light.

    [And more nasty things like this.]

    Personal attacks ahoy. Rather than make a rational, logical response, which might appear to legitimize the dissent, resort to vague implications about how dumb/stubborn/evil the dissident is. With luck, this will “otherize” the dissident and result in a round of backpatting and high-fives to create a sense of solidarity among the in-group.

    I’ve seen this done plenty of times before. You’ll please excuse me if I don’t play this game with you.

    [Why is it everyone wants to argue with me here instead of in the Domain, where these statements were made? This is very rude to Donal, who is generously allowing everyone to comment. I have said repeatedly that if someone has a question or objection to something I’ve written in the Domain, I’ll be more than happy to discuss it with you there rather than fighting a war on someone else’s front lawn–especially if you have a hard time keeping a civil tongue in your head…er, civil hands on your keyboard?

    [Sorry for the mess, Donal.]

  29. theshadowedknight's avatar theshadowedknight

    Sigyn, you are nitpicking to try to score rhetorical points. Stop. Argue the substance of the argument, and stop playing games. It is quite obvious what you are doing. Yes, I can see what you are doing, and no, I will not apologize, and no, I do not care.

    FBNF, are you joking? They are single because they want to be. Have their fun and act like whores while complaining that their knight is missing. They are marriage minded now that they see the end getting closer.

    Maybe not all women are like that, but it is not enough to matter. Like I said, I have listened to how hard the life of a woman is my entire life. I do not care. Make a Gynosphere and write blogs about how men will not commit and men are afraid of marriage. Coming here and wailing about woe is you is not helping your cause.

    Just as a reality check, you showed up here and told your story and got, “Girl, we have got to find you a husband.” Men show up and we get, “Find a gym and start lifting heavy, reorganize your life after reassessing it and everything you know, eat healthy, talk to women, learn several skills, suffer through combat dating, approach, approach approach…” Wow, now that I spell that out, you do have it hard. My heart bleeds, and I weep bitter tears for your plight.

    The Shadowed Knight

  30. Cassie's avatar femininebutnotfeminist

    @ TSK,

    “Regarding sympathy or the lack thereof for the problems of women, I will start feeling bad when I see some of these women start talking to some of the men. They have options here, but I am not seeing any takers. I do not care if they are having trouble, because it is self inflicted.”

    How do you know some of the women aren’t talking to some of the men behind the scenes? Perhaps the reason you don’t see any takers yourself is because you don’t care about what we face, and it very much shows.

  31. theshadowedknight's avatar theshadowedknight

    Actually, I had an argument with cogent points after the opener. If you had bothered to read it. Not a several paragraph ad homoniem, but good points. As I said, you have decided not to understand, so I am not especially concerned with your take on it. The men who do not comment need to hear this. Someone needs to be the one to point this out. This happens everywhere else. Women enter, take control of the narrative, direct it towards themselves, and stifle dissent and men along with it. The men should hear this.

    In any case, I am arguing here for two reasons. One, your post is only tangentially related to the original message in Donal’s post, as an example. I am making a point based on his writing, not yours. You serve as a dialectical vivisection, nothing more; a subject of scrutiny. This could occur without you, and the audience is here, not at your blog. The conversation is here, so here it shall stay, until I am asked to leave. Two, do you really think me such a fool as to allow you to control the field? My objective is not found in the Domain, so I have no interest, and I will not fight on ground of your choosing.

    The Shadowed Knight

  32. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ TSK

    Yes, it is a nitpick. I don’t really care if I’m incorrect if the substance of what I’ve said is incorrect. No skin in the game except for hopefully one woman that I am to marry. Nitpicking just to want to win for the sake of winning an argument is petty.

  33. Cassie's avatar femininebutnotfeminist

    @ TSK,

    No, I am not joking. And it’s not MY woe is me story, it’s the woe is me story of MANY women I have known who DO NOT fit the “have her fun and slut it up” mold and still can’t find a husband (we already know you don’t care about it/us, so there is no need to go into that again). And I never said you guys don’t have it hard, just that it’s not so cut and dry easy for some of us girls. Just as Deep Strength said up-thread, it’s hard for anybody that isn’t a 9 or 10 male.

  34. theshadowedknight's avatar theshadowedknight

    FBNF, truthfully, I have no idea. I could be completely wrong. However, I have seen JSP and Alla ask for help and guidance. I have not seen others. Have you talked to any one of the men around here?

    Also, not interested in any takers. I have given up on women, and that was not a result of being ignored. Nor, in fact, was the lack due to indifference towards women on my part. If anything, an indifferent and scornful attitude would help. No, that was just the reality of the modern woman, and just how much trouble they are when I can do just about anything they can do besides sex. it makes no sense to keep them around, given the damage they tend to inflict.

    The Shadowed Knight

  35. I shall now endeavor to provide some responses and thoughts based on the discussion so far.

    With regards to women looking at or choosing an older husband-

    The possibility of early widowhood and prolonged loneliness is a concern that shouldn’t be ignored. But it is something that I think is often overblown. SSM mentioned fear being left alone, and this I think gets to the heart of the problem. Women are fearful creatures, and making difficult decisions, like whom to marry, brings out the fear in them like few other things. I suspect that in most cases the fear is not rational, and I believe this was recognized in the past, which is why women had to be pushed to marry. I should also note that not all women are as worried about an older husband, including some of the female readers who helped contribute to this post.

    Seriouslypleasedropit provided an excellent comment, one which ties in perfect to the point of this post.

    Something I think the male commenters/readers should keep in mind is that most of the female readers and commenters here are not normal. They are outliers, and thus their stories probably don’t match up with most folks. Many of the women I talked with who helped me formulate the post are chaste Christian women who have always been chaste. That alone separates them from their sisters. Now, this post wasn’t focused purely on chaste women, but female chastity definitely played a part in its formation. I am working on a post that addresses the that issue more directly, in part because of the responses to this post.

  36. Amanda,

    Noted.

    What will your sons be told about the smp?

  37. Cassie's avatar femininebutnotfeminist

    @ TSK,

    While I haven’t publicly requested help, I have accepted a couple of offers of help, as well as talk to one guy behind the scenes, and would be willing to talk to others as well. Though I won’t say any more about that publicly, and especially not without said-peoples’ permission. From the way both of the people that offered to help me have talked, I’m not an exception here. As for you giving up altogether (I don’t blame you one bit considering everything I have learned lately about what you guys have to deal with) I’m very sorry that things happen the way they do and that it didn’t work out better for you (I know it was your choice to do so, but life absolutely sucks sometimes and I’m sure you unfortunately had good reasons to choose that way).

  38. With regards to what Sigyn wrote at her blog, I think that many men are misinterpreting it. She is making an entirely understandable argument that there are limits to sympathy/empathy. You can only hear a story so many times before you become numb to it. This isn’t female cruelty, just human nature.

    Sigyn’s post is very different from Haley’s. Haley asked a question, and she got some answers she didn’t like. Siygn is noting a tendency among many men in the manosphere to dismiss female woes in the MMP out of hand. And I have to agree with her. I see it too, and not just in this post, or even this blog. Stories from women about their own difficulties are dismissed out of hand, and oft times they are called delusional or ignorant, sometimes outright liars. Perhaps it is because I know one young woman outside of the ‘net who is experiencing these same problems, but I don’t dismiss these stories so casually.

  39. Oh, by the way, on the whole age and compatibility thing, I find that to be mostly bunk. I have found more in common with a woman ten years my younger than I find regularly with my peers. And she the same. Age isn’t the primary determinant in compatibility, although it can be factor through maturity and common experiences.

  40. @ Amanda

    You do have skin in this game, whether you realize it or not. You have sons. Do you want them to marry? Well, the age range at which women look for husbands should matter to you then. Given the deficit of marriageable women these days, they might not find a wife while very young.

  41. Just as a reality check, you showed up here and told your story and got, “Girl, we have got to find you a husband.” Men show up and we get, “Find a gym and start lifting heavy, reorganize your life after reassessing it and everything you know, eat healthy, talk to women, learn several skills, suffer through combat dating, approach, approach approach…” Wow, now that I spell that out, you do have it hard. My heart bleeds, and I weep bitter tears for your plight.

    TSK
    I’m the one who made that light-hearted quip to FBNF. In the context, it was clearly meant to be humorous. Having said that, you’d be surprised at how many men have emailed me and asked me to keep out an eye for a suitable woman for them; I have never refused to do that for any Christian man who has emailed me, though unfortunately I am suffering from an insufficient number of suitable women to recommend to them.

    It is possible to have compassion for the plight of both men and women in the modern S/MMP. None of us hand-crafted this situation, and I think almost all of us would very much like it to look different. I have more sorrow for the situation men face because their burdens seem heavier, but that doesn’t mean that young, chaste women aren’t bearing some burdens and shedding some tears either.

    @ donal

    The possibility of early widowhood and prolonged loneliness is a concern that shouldn’t be ignored. But it is something that I think is often overblown. SSM mentioned fear being left alone, and this I think gets to the heart of the problem. Women are fearful creatures, and making difficult decisions, like whom to marry, brings out the fear in them like few other things.

    Yes, I do believe you are right. Women are generally rather fearful when we are unclaimed. Our sense of security is very much tied up in having a husband. The thought of being widowed horrifies me; I can’t even really think about it.

  42. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ SSM

    Yes, I do believe you are right. Women are generally rather fearful when we are unclaimed. Our sense of security is very much tied up in having a husband. The thought of being widowed horrifies me; I can’t even really think about it.

    That’s the thing though as I believe TSK said on the previous page — would a woman rather be alone for 50-60+ years, or would she rather at least have a husband for 40-5+ of those and maybe be widowed for a decade or two?

    As much as a woman can fear for being widowed is it better not have a husband at all?

  43. @ SSM

    Having said that, you’d be surprised at how many men have emailed me and asked me to keep out an eye for a suitable woman for them; I have never refused to do that for any Christian man who has emailed me, though unfortunately I am suffering from an insufficient number of suitable women to recommend to them.

    Interesting. I was unaware that so many men have contacted you for that purpose. The last part is the kicker though when it comes to actually helping. You can only work with what you have SSM.

    Women are generally rather fearful when we are unclaimed. Our sense of security is very much tied up in having a husband. The thought of being widowed horrifies me; I can’t even really think about it.

    Part of me wonders if this is because you don’t have any sons. I’ve long suspected that women with sons tend to have a greater sense of security, arising from that extra male presence in their lives.

  44. Oh, by the way, on the whole age and compatibility thing, I find that to be mostly bunk. I have found more in common with a woman ten years my younger than I find regularly with my peers. And she the same. Age isn’t the primary determinant in compatibility, although it can be factor through maturity and common experiences.

    Donal, what then do you think is the reason that women strongly prefer to marry men who are within five years of their own age? This isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s been the case for most of recorded history. Certainly men marry much younger women, but the overall average is consistently fewer than five years difference in age.

    For the preference to continue to be the norm for most of human history, there has to be some reason for it. I’ve suggested a few – fear of widowhood, incompatibility due to being in different life-stages – but if you think those are wrong, what do you suppose the real reason is?

    By the way, a few people seem to be unclear on what my actual argument is:

    What I am arguing:

    – it is a fact that women have always preferred men close in age to them for marriage
    – there are a number of hypothesized reasons why this may be so (I’ve suggested a few possibilities)

    What I am not arguing:

    – that it is bad for women to marry much older men
    – that much older men have no chance with young women
    – that there is some moral or personal objection to large age gaps.

  45. That’s the thing though as I believe TSK said on the previous page — would a woman rather be alone for 50-60+ years, or would she rather at least have a husband for 40-5+ of those and maybe be widowed for a decade or two?

    As much as a woman can fear for being widowed is it better not have a husband at all?

    Well, personally, I’d rather have a husband, and if I had to marry an older man, then that is what I would do. I would rather be widowed than a spinster.

    But do other women feel the same? I don’t know. My best friend from college is married to man 17 years her senior. They seem relatively happy, though they’ve had a few sticking points that I think may have been caused by their age difference. But no divorce, and they have a child together, so it seems pretty stable.

  46. Part of me wonders if this is because you don’t have any sons. I’ve long suspected that women with sons tend to have a greater sense of security, arising from that extra male presence in their lives.

    Hmm, could be Donal. I hadn’t thought of that, but it’s certainly possible. Then again, I hope to have sons-in-law one day, so maybe that will change how I feel. I’ll report back to the group when I know.

  47. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ SSM

    Donal, what then do you think is the reason that women strongly prefer to marry men who are within five years of their own age? This isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s been the case for most of recorded history. Certainly men marry much younger women, but the overall average is consistently fewer than five years difference in age.

    For the preference to continue to be the norm for most of human history, there has to be some reason for it. I’ve suggested a few – fear of widowhood, incompatibility due to being in different life-stages – but if you think those are wrong, what do you suppose the real reason is?

    By the way, a few people seem to be unclear on what my actual argument is:

    What I am arguing:

    – it is a fact that women have always preferred men close in age to them for marriage
    – there are a number of hypothesized reasons why this may be so (I’ve suggested a few possibilities)

    What I am not arguing:

    – that it is bad for women to marry much older men
    – that much older men have no chance with young women
    – that there is some moral or personal objection to large age gaps.

    Men were married off in Jesus’ time when they were 15-16 and the women were 13-14.

    Even in the US before the past 50-60 or so years I believe the average age of marriage was 16-20ish for women and 20-22ish for men?

    There could be no such large age differences because men didn’t have to be involuntary celibate for 10-15+ years after puberty.

  48. @ SSM

    Donal, what then do you think is the reason that women strongly prefer to marry men who are within five years of their own age? This isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s been the case for most of recorded history. Certainly men marry much younger women, but the overall average is consistently fewer than five years difference in age.

    Interesting question. I can think of several possible answers. (that are not mutually exclusive)
    1) A younger mate is more likely to be a healthier mate. This translates into healthier young (although male fertility isn’t impacted as much by age as female fertility, it does have some impact), as well as a greater likelihood of sustained provision. In this past this would have been far more meaningful than it is today.
    2) Power disparity- a younger woman married to an older man may not have the power and influence in the relationship that a couple with similar ages might have. An older men might have greater experience with women, and thus be less likely to fall or buckle under to her female charms/manipulations. She might also be more dependent on him than in a close age-gap marriage.

    Again, from a female perspective, it makes a certain amount of sense to look for a male closer to her age as a suitable partner. I don’t dismiss that at all. It is another example of how male and female mating strategies are opposed to one another.

    However, the nature of the present MMP is such that she needs to be aware of this tendency and reject it if it should prove necessary.

  49. @ DS

    Actually, a century ago men tended to marry around 25 and women 21ish. However, puberty hit later back then, at least for women. So that plays a role. Also, those stats reflected those who reported such info (more likely to be urban v. rural). Other facts played into it as well, including the wide availability of prostitution as well as changes in the labor market.

  50. Deep Strength's avatar Deep Strength

    @ Donal

    Ah, thanks for the info.

    So it has only been since the invention of college/universities (in the 1800s?) that the married age of men have been pushed up for men above 20+?

    I know at least in medieval times and back to Jesus times it was 15-16 for men and 13-14 for women on average.

Leave a comment